Corporate social responsibility, corporate citizenship, corporate accountability, stakeholder engagement, sustainable development. These are just a sample of different terms that express the same concept. But what does CSR really mean? The conventional concept of CSR is philanthropic contributions and aid by corporations. However, this understanding of CSR is largely being questioned and criticised by opinion leaders, NGOs, responsible investors, and media alike. Others, particularly in the western hemisphere, have a conflicting opinion that governments and not companies should generally be responsible for social benefits.
Recently, I have come across a lot of blog posts and news articles looking at how CSR has changed over the last few years with a move away from
responsibility with an emphasis now on
social – “CSR is no longer about what companies
aren't doing wrong but about what they
are doing right.”
Marian Salzman’s blog in The Huffington Post discusses how social networks are becoming increasingly significant in raising awareness, promoting causes and fund-raising.
Terence Corcoran, writing for the National Post talks about the inverse relationship between the rise of responsibility and stakeholder governance theories and corporate performance.
Michael Edwards, in the Guardian, points out some of the challenges these more traditional practice of corporate philanthropy deflects attention away from the need to change core business practices to add more value to communities receiving aid. Also in The Huffington Post,
Jeffrey Hollender adds to the calls for a Corporate Responsibility 2.0 which utilises business competition over a philanthropic approach, through his new book,
The Responsibility Revolution: How the Next Generation of Businesses Will Win written with co-author Bill Breen.
If not the conventional CSR approach, what is the way forward for businesses?
The first and most basic action is thinking long-term and following sound business principles to create value for shareholders and for society through its activities --- in terms of jobs for workers, taxes to support public services, and economic activity in general.
But there is also a further step that companies can take – creating shared value. A company should consciously identify areas of focus, where shareholders’ interest and society’s interest strongly intersect and where value creation can be optimised for both. As a result, the company invests resources, both in terms of talent and capital, in those areas where the potential for joint value creation is the greatest.
Due to the nature of our company and its operations, Nestlé has chosen nutrition, water, and rural development as the areas with greatest potential for joint value optimisation. You can find more of Nestlé’s CSV operations on
www.nestle.com/csv.